Space; the next frontier – now at the mainframe computing moment

There were two Tweets about satellites in my newsfeed this morning. Usually there aren’t any.

The first was an Economist article about nano-satellites describing how satellites are getting smaller and cheaper. Remember what that did to the computer market? We could well be on the brink of something similarly transformational in satellites. Nano-satellites weigh as little as a few kilos and are ‘thousands of times cheaper’ than their larger brethren, and launch costs are falling rapidly too (the article doesn’t provide detail on the speed with which launch costs are falling, but I guess they correlate with weight). Nano-satellites are less capable, or course, but can still do useful tasks.

And as with computers declining cost has resulted in increased unit volumes. Around 1,000 large operational satellites are circling the earth, and in the last year they have been joined by around 100 nano-satellites. And 1,000 more nano-satellites are expected over the next five years.

In rough summary, costs have fallen by around three orders of magnitude and number of new satellites in the next five years will be roughly equal to total the number previously launched (forgetting about satellites that have been launched but are no longer operational).

If I was to map this to the computing industry I would say costs and unit volumes are comparable with somewhere in the late 1950s, the first decade of the mainframe era. In 1953 it was estimated there were 100 computers in the world.

You have probably guessed where I’m going with this – we could be on the cusp of a wave of satellite based innovation, and if so there will be startups… I don’t think satellites will be as transformative to society as computers, but it could nonetheless be powerful. It’s true that it’s difficult to envisage what that transformation might look like, but then the same was true of computers in the 1950s. It wasn’t until the 1970s that Bill Gates said he wanted to put a computer in every home, and even then people thought he was crazy.

The second piece of news was that Google has bought nano-satellite company Skybox for a rumoured $1.2bn. It seems they are thinking along the same lines I am and that space is the next frontier. (I wanted space to be the final frontier, but if space is next, then I think the human body, or maybe human brain, will be the final frontier.)

  • http://RogerEllman.com/ Roger Ellman

    Perceptive and fascinating. It is also a wondrous new swath of potential for future technology and the application of many of our current technological services.
    I would agree with idea of the human mind being a great candidate for the final frontier, yet I think we will always find and be surprised by a new horizon we will uncover. Something not yet thought of, at least not by many perhaps. Seems to be our pattern?

  • http://www.theequitykicker.com brisbourne

    True enough Roger. There will always be something new. Time travel maybe?

  • http://RogerEllman.com/ Roger Ellman

    That’s it…there’s one! Genetic modification – choose to be shaped and formed any way you want (will be laced with controversy); Particle transfer of items, molecular re-construction – obviating the need for packing and delivery (beyond the Amazon quadcopter delivery system!); another for now…hopefully advances in the ability of human beings to communicate rationally and logically, while still being able to be creative….etcetera.

  • http://www.theequitykicker.com brisbourne

    Love it. Can’t wait for the future!