Personal health

Body weight – lean mass and fat mass

By September 13, 2011 10 Comments

In January 2010 when I started getting serious about my health and staying young for longer losing weight was easily the most important objective.  As you can almost see from the chart below at that point my weight was 77.8kg and 24.6% of that was fat (rather than muscle or bone).

I started recording what I ate, and counting the calories, and in a couple of steps I went down from eating 3,000-3,500 calories a day to a target of 2,000-2,100 (excluding alcohol).  The weight started dropping off pretty quickly and my body fat percentage also dropped.

I was then faced with figuring out what my target weight was, and a lot of friends were concerned that I was going too far.  I have long had this notion that 67.5-70kg (147-154lb) was a good target, but I wanted to be a bit more scientific.  The Body Mass Index or BMI was too crude for me, so I decided to define my goal as achieving a body fat percentage of 10-13%, a figure I took from Ray Kurzweil’s TRANSCENDWikipedia suggests that fit male adults should have 14-17% body fat, with male athletes at 6-13%.  Women are higher – 21-24% for fit females, and 14-20% for female athletes.

The next problem then, was to measure my body fat percentage, and that turns out to be quite a challenge, as you will see from the rest of this post.  I had the data from my Withings Scale, which is what you can see in the chart below, but I wasn’t happy that it was accurate.  The day to day fluctuations were too great to make sense and I had this nagging feeling that at around 16% all the numbers were on the high side.


The first thing I did was buy a handheld body fat measurement unit which uses the same electrical impedance technique as the Withings Scale, hoping that a second measurement might corroborate the first, or give a clear idea where it was wrong (e.g. if it was too high).  Unfortunately the measurements from the new unit had greater fluctuations than the Withings Scale, and the numbers were on average even higher!

My next step was to get measured in a Bopod unit in Hampstead back in June.  That showed my body fat percentage as 9.9%, which struck me as too low, and my confidence in the number wasn’t helped by the fact that the operator took an unscheduled third measurement because the first two were unusually far apart. 

However, if the 9.9% was accurate then I shouldn’t be losing any more weight, and that had an impact on my diet.

Since June I have put on 1-2kg (impossible to be more precise than that because my weight fluctuates by 1-2kg on an intra-day basis), and I was thinking the increase was due to an increase in my lean mass rather than because I had put on fat.  How wrong I was.

Yesterday I got measured in a DXA unit which uses a scanning technique, and my body fat percentage has increased to 14.3%.  The increase from 9.9% in June to 14.3% measured yesterday is explained mathematically by a 3.5kg increase in my body fat and 0.8kg decrease in my lean weight, which that 81% of the increase comes from an increase in fat.  Rather depressing.

Once again, however, I am unconvinced by the quality of the data.  Looking at myself in the mirror, I think 14.3% body fat is too high, and I have two issues with the measurements.  Firstly, I find it hard to believe that my lean mass has decreased in the three months since June.  I strongly suspect the 0.8kg decline is due to calibration or measurement errors with either the Bopod or the DXA machine.  Secondly, I weighed in at 72.5kg yesterday, which is 2.5kg up on Saturday morning, and I think that is at the top end of my day to day cycle of fluctuations.  If I had weighed 71kg, which is about average for me at the moment, and the 1.5kg difference came off the fat mass then my body fat percentage would be 12.5%, and just inside my target range.

This story illustrates just how hard it is to get accurate data on our bodies.  I have described how I have bought two different home measurement devices and gone for two scans, the total cost of which is £220 and a lot of hassle.

As I written at length in the context of startups measurement and good data are critical to good decision making.  That is also true in matters of personal health, but with the additional qualification that capturing the data must be easy and convenient if it is to be picked up by the mass market.  Whilst the Withings Scale is a step in the right direction the quality of the data coming out of it isn’t good enough once the body fat percentage gets into the 15-20% range, and we are clearly some way from the point where measuring lean mass and fat mass will go mainstream.

Enhanced by Zemanta