<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Record labels growing unease with ad supported music streaming services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mason Fuller</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-12827</link>
		<dc:creator>Mason Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-12827</guid>
		<description>About a year ago a couple of start-ups announced their intentions to take the US by storm with a completely new take on ad-supported free mp3 downloads.These services promised to do what several others have tried and failed. Read this article on the problems with the models http://bit.ly/dCJ4kO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About a year ago a couple of start-ups announced their intentions to take the US by storm with a completely new take on ad-supported free mp3 downloads.These services promised to do what several others have tried and failed. Read this article on the problems with the models <a href="http://bit.ly/dCJ4kO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dCJ4kO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zixmail pricing</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-7918</link>
		<dc:creator>zixmail pricing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-7918</guid>
		<description>i think As Spotify launches in the US this will be its year ... jostling and grandstanding as music majors renegotiate with streaming services!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think As Spotify launches in the US this will be its year &#8230; jostling and grandstanding as music majors renegotiate with streaming services!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » Now TV companies are questioning the ad-funded content model</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-6878</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Geek » Now TV companies are questioning the ad-funded content model</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-6878</guid>
		<description>[...] week I wrote about the growing unease at the major record labels with ad funded music streaming services, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week I wrote about the growing unease at the major record labels with ad funded music streaming services, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-6866</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-6866</guid>
		<description>Ha! They will go down fighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! They will go down fighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Smirl</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-6865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Smirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-6865</guid>
		<description>From ars this morning:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2010/02/p2p-use-down-but-24m-fewer-people-bought-music-in-09-vs-07.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2010/02/p2p-u...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The world has changed and we don&#039;t need the labels any more in their current form. The faster they morph into booking agents for live acts, the better off they will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From ars this morning:<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2010/02/p2p-use-down-but-24m-fewer-people-bought-music-in-09-vs-07.ars?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2010/02/p2p-u&#8230;</a></p>
<p>The world has changed and we don&#39;t need the labels any more in their current form. The faster they morph into booking agents for live acts, the better off they will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-6864</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-6864</guid>
		<description>You might well be right Jon.  This could turn out to be a backwards step by the music industry, but they (the labels) are literally hanging on for their lives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The irony is that the P2P options are getting better and easier to use, so wasting time simply compounds the problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nic Brisbourne, Partner DFJ Esprit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might well be right Jon.  This could turn out to be a backwards step by the music industry, but they (the labels) are literally hanging on for their lives.</p>
<p>The irony is that the P2P options are getting better and easier to use, so wasting time simply compounds the problem.</p>
<p>Nic Brisbourne, Partner DFJ Esprit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Smirl</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-6863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Smirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/02/26/record-labels-growing-unease-with-ad-supported-music-streaming-services/#comment-6863</guid>
		<description>Free streaming has been putting a real dent in piracy. Why do they want to go backwards?  I think last.fm paid $40M in royalties last year. $40M is way better than zero from p2p.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are better solutions that totally pulling free streaming. The pricing model assumes all tracks are equally valuable. A smarter strategy would be to migrate hits from free streaming and make you pay to get them as they rise in popularity. Add feedback to your web page as to how many of your songs have migrated to the pay streams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free streaming has been putting a real dent in piracy. Why do they want to go backwards?  I think last.fm paid $40M in royalties last year. $40M is way better than zero from p2p.</p>
<p>There are better solutions that totally pulling free streaming. The pricing model assumes all tracks are equally valuable. A smarter strategy would be to migrate hits from free streaming and make you pay to get them as they rise in popularity. Add feedback to your web page as to how many of your songs have migrated to the pay streams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.256 seconds -->

