<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Companies that add value to their ecosystems are more sustainable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Cromwell</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-12636</link>
		<dc:creator>Cromwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-12636</guid>
		<description>hello all you nerds out there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello all you nerds out there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cawky</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-12635</link>
		<dc:creator>Cawky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-12635</guid>
		<description>hello all you nerds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello all you nerds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-6306</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-6306</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris - the difference between short term revenues and longer term value creation that I am talking about, and you are right that VC money has sometimes chased the former. I guess what I&#039;m signalling here more than anything is that I&#039;m interested in the latter - and as you say they will be businesses that have some form of long term competitive advantage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By simple re-sellers I mean low-margin pile-it-high sell-it-cheap companies.  There are lots of IT hardware companies in this category and some etailers where long term profitability can be elusive. Companies (like Graze) that change the product on the way through or add value via their brand fall outside of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris &#8211; the difference between short term revenues and longer term value creation that I am talking about, and you are right that VC money has sometimes chased the former. I guess what I&#39;m signalling here more than anything is that I&#39;m interested in the latter &#8211; and as you say they will be businesses that have some form of long term competitive advantage.</p>
<p>By simple re-sellers I mean low-margin pile-it-high sell-it-cheap companies.  There are lots of IT hardware companies in this category and some etailers where long term profitability can be elusive. Companies (like Graze) that change the product on the way through or add value via their brand fall outside of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrispadfield</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-6305</link>
		<dc:creator>chrispadfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-6305</guid>
		<description>What do you mean by re-sellers? Most re-sellers package another product/service with what they are selling (is this not what Graze is doing?) or are retailers - which is clearly value creating. Even resellers which just brand a product (for example Sony for some products) are lending their brand to a product which consumers value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would tend to agree on confusing business models, although still a long way to go in lots of industries such as finance and travel. I don&#039;t think the confusing nature of some of these industries will prevent VC investment though partly because I don&#039;t expect them to become transparent in the near future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess the argument is really about the difference between short term revenue/profit generation and the long term. Arguably I think a lot of VCs have actually invested into the former and aimed for a quick exit - but I expect we will see a re-focus on long term value building. I always think the most important question to ask a company is &quot;What will be your long term, unfair, competitive advantage&quot; and I think it is the lack of that for some companies that is really the issue you are addressing. If they have that competitive advantage, they will be building value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean by re-sellers? Most re-sellers package another product/service with what they are selling (is this not what Graze is doing?) or are retailers &#8211; which is clearly value creating. Even resellers which just brand a product (for example Sony for some products) are lending their brand to a product which consumers value.</p>
<p>I would tend to agree on confusing business models, although still a long way to go in lots of industries such as finance and travel. I don&#39;t think the confusing nature of some of these industries will prevent VC investment though partly because I don&#39;t expect them to become transparent in the near future.</p>
<p>I guess the argument is really about the difference between short term revenue/profit generation and the long term. Arguably I think a lot of VCs have actually invested into the former and aimed for a quick exit &#8211; but I expect we will see a re-focus on long term value building. I always think the most important question to ask a company is &#8220;What will be your long term, unfair, competitive advantage&#8221; and I think it is the lack of that for some companies that is really the issue you are addressing. If they have that competitive advantage, they will be building value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-6104</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-6104</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris - the difference between short term revenues and longer term value creation that I am talking about, and you are right that VC money has sometimes chased the former. I guess what I&#039;m signalling here more than anything is that I&#039;m interested in the latter - and as you say they will be businesses that have some form of long term competitive advantage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By simple re-sellers I mean low-margin pile-it-high sell-it-cheap companies.  There are lots of IT hardware companies in this category and some etailers where long term profitability can be elusive. Companies (like Graze) that change the product on the way through or add value via their brand fall outside of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris &#8211; the difference between short term revenues and longer term value creation that I am talking about, and you are right that VC money has sometimes chased the former. I guess what I&#39;m signalling here more than anything is that I&#39;m interested in the latter &#8211; and as you say they will be businesses that have some form of long term competitive advantage.</p>
<p>By simple re-sellers I mean low-margin pile-it-high sell-it-cheap companies.  There are lots of IT hardware companies in this category and some etailers where long term profitability can be elusive. Companies (like Graze) that change the product on the way through or add value via their brand fall outside of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrispadfield</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-6103</link>
		<dc:creator>chrispadfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/24/companies-that-add-value-to-their-ecosystems-are-more-sustainable/#comment-6103</guid>
		<description>What do you mean by re-sellers? Most re-sellers package another product/service with what they are selling (is this not what Graze is doing?) or are retailers - which is clearly value creating. Even resellers which just brand a product (for example Sony for some products) are lending their brand to a product which consumers value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would tend to agree on confusing business models, although still a long way to go in lots of industries such as finance and travel. I don&#039;t think the confusing nature of some of these industries will prevent VC investment though partly because I don&#039;t expect them to become transparent in the near future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess the argument is really about the difference between short term revenue/profit generation and the long term. Arguably I think a lot of VCs have actually invested into the former and aimed for a quick exit - but I expect we will see a re-focus on long term value building. I always think the most important question to ask a company is &quot;What will be your long term, unfair, competitive advantage&quot; and I think it is the lack of that for some companies that is really the issue you are addressing. If they have that competitive advantage, they will be building value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean by re-sellers? Most re-sellers package another product/service with what they are selling (is this not what Graze is doing?) or are retailers &#8211; which is clearly value creating. Even resellers which just brand a product (for example Sony for some products) are lending their brand to a product which consumers value.</p>
<p>I would tend to agree on confusing business models, although still a long way to go in lots of industries such as finance and travel. I don&#39;t think the confusing nature of some of these industries will prevent VC investment though partly because I don&#39;t expect them to become transparent in the near future.</p>
<p>I guess the argument is really about the difference between short term revenue/profit generation and the long term. Arguably I think a lot of VCs have actually invested into the former and aimed for a quick exit &#8211; but I expect we will see a re-focus on long term value building. I always think the most important question to ask a company is &#8220;What will be your long term, unfair, competitive advantage&#8221; and I think it is the lack of that for some companies that is really the issue you are addressing. If they have that competitive advantage, they will be building value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.247 seconds -->

