<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News corp still talking about blocking Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: lsywlw00</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6135</link>
		<dc:creator>lsywlw00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6135</guid>
		<description>we can supply chloe gucci and balenciaga handbag &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lookhandbag.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.lookhandbag.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we can supply chloe gucci and balenciaga handbag <br /><a href="http://www.lookhandbag.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lookhandbag.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libhomo</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6058</link>
		<dc:creator>libhomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6058</guid>
		<description>Google News would be improved dramatically if Murdoch&#039;s filth was gone. Google should be filtering his stuff out based on their own best interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google News would be improved dramatically if Murdoch&#39;s filth was gone. Google should be filtering his stuff out based on their own best interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6054</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6054</guid>
		<description>I agree - the long and short of it is that News Corps&#039; position is weak and getting worse, both with Myspace and the news sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; the long and short of it is that News Corps&#39; position is weak and getting worse, both with Myspace and the news sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LIAD</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6053</link>
		<dc:creator>LIAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6053</guid>
		<description>negotiating with google will be tough - they aren&#039;t in any position to set the terms. &lt;br&gt;(whilst minor they also have the MySpace advertising deal coming up for renewal - they&#039;re going to get spanked on that one too)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Calacanis had a nice idea about out-flanking google with bings help - &lt;a href=&quot;http://calacanis.com/2009/11/09/how-to-kill-google-or-take-10-points-of-search-search-share-in-six-months/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://calacanis.com/2009/11/09/how-to-kill-goo...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>negotiating with google will be tough &#8211; they aren&#39;t in any position to set the terms. <br />(whilst minor they also have the MySpace advertising deal coming up for renewal &#8211; they&#39;re going to get spanked on that one too)</p>
<p>Calacanis had a nice idea about out-flanking google with bings help &#8211; <a href="http://calacanis.com/2009/11/09/how-to-kill-google-or-take-10-points-of-search-search-share-in-six-months/" rel="nofollow">http://calacanis.com/2009/11/09/how-to-kill-goo&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6051</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6051</guid>
		<description>In addition they may be trying to position themselves for some kind of deal with Google whereby they license and XML feed or API.  I agree that this seems somehow beneath Murdoch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition they may be trying to position themselves for some kind of deal with Google whereby they license and XML feed or API.  I agree that this seems somehow beneath Murdoch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LIAD</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6050</link>
		<dc:creator>LIAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/11/13/news-corp-still-talking-about-blocking-google/#comment-6050</guid>
		<description>I think his comments as well as Murdochs from earlier this week should be taken in the same vein as when O&#039;Leary from RyanAir announces all manner of outlandish and sensationalist ideas - namely - give us some exposure and let the op-ed pieces critique our plans and hopefully come up with better solutuions than we have been able to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Was &#039;sad&#039; to see Murdoch flapping about in his extended interview this week - seemed a shadow of his former self - definately wasn&#039;t sufficiently briefed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think his comments as well as Murdochs from earlier this week should be taken in the same vein as when O&#39;Leary from RyanAir announces all manner of outlandish and sensationalist ideas &#8211; namely &#8211; give us some exposure and let the op-ed pieces critique our plans and hopefully come up with better solutuions than we have been able to.</p>
<p>Was &#39;sad&#39; to see Murdoch flapping about in his extended interview this week &#8211; seemed a shadow of his former self &#8211; definately wasn&#39;t sufficiently briefed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.238 seconds -->

