<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reminder &#8211; success equals profits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » Profits, success and subscription models</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-5790</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Geek » Profits, success and subscription models</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-5790</guid>
		<description>[...] week I posted that success equals profits and got an email response from William Reeve, saying very true, and good post, but don’t forget [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week I posted that success equals profits and got an email response from William Reeve, saying very true, and good post, but don’t forget [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinowen</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-6313</link>
		<dc:creator>martinowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-6313</guid>
		<description>Until there are profits, any enterprise is less than a zero sum game. In a buy out, or even in an IPO, losses are passed from one investor to another. It is only when a product/system/service is actually genreating added value can it be successful. Individual investors can be successful - but that would be as a result of some other investor&#039;s loss. Only when returns exceed investment is there a real &quot;success&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until there are profits, any enterprise is less than a zero sum game. In a buy out, or even in an IPO, losses are passed from one investor to another. It is only when a product/system/service is actually genreating added value can it be successful. Individual investors can be successful &#8211; but that would be as a result of some other investor&#39;s loss. Only when returns exceed investment is there a real &#8220;success&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinowen</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-5772</link>
		<dc:creator>martinowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-5772</guid>
		<description>Until there are profits, any enterprise is less than a zero sum game. In a buy out, or even in an IPO, losses are passed from one investor to another. It is only when a product/system/service is actually genreating added value can it be successful. Individual investors can be successful - but that would be as a result of some other investor&#039;s loss. Only when returns exceed investment is there a real &quot;success&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until there are profits, any enterprise is less than a zero sum game. In a buy out, or even in an IPO, losses are passed from one investor to another. It is only when a product/system/service is actually genreating added value can it be successful. Individual investors can be successful &#8211; but that would be as a result of some other investor&#39;s loss. Only when returns exceed investment is there a real &#8220;success&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-5771</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-5771</guid>
		<description>:D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That warm glow inside is no substitute for a good meal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.theequitykicker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That warm glow inside is no substitute for a good meal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alx Klive</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-11863</link>
		<dc:creator>Alx Klive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-11863</guid>
		<description>Great point Nic. A return for shareholders can come in different ways and is not necessarily predicated on profits as you say. Another source of return for shareholders could be a share buyback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Nic. A return for shareholders can come in different ways and is not necessarily predicated on profits as you say. Another source of return for shareholders could be a share buyback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-5770</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-5770</guid>
		<description>Nick - are you sure success isn&#039;t just about how many times you can get your business name mentioned at networking events and dinner parties? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick &#8211; are you sure success isn&#39;t just about how many times you can get your business name mentioned at networking events and dinner parties? <img src='http://www.theequitykicker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csertoglu</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-5768</link>
		<dc:creator>csertoglu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/09/03/reminder-success-equals-profits/#comment-5768</guid>
		<description>Great point Nic.  One additional axis that may be considered is value creation.  I see companies that turn a profit (spammers, etc.) that can identify an opportunity and go after is aggressively, that end up generating returns to their shareholders.  I find it hard to call them successful.  There needs to be &quot;thick&quot; value for success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Nic.  One additional axis that may be considered is value creation.  I see companies that turn a profit (spammers, etc.) that can identify an opportunity and go after is aggressively, that end up generating returns to their shareholders.  I find it hard to call them successful.  There needs to be &#8220;thick&#8221; value for success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.231 seconds -->

