<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making heavy users pay &#8211; the optimum freemium model for news?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: huang</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5623</link>
		<dc:creator>huang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5623</guid>
		<description>&lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;!--&lt;br&gt;.STYLE1 {&lt;br&gt;	font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;&lt;br&gt;	font-size: 14px;&lt;br&gt;}&lt;br&gt;--&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/style&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;STYLE1&quot;&gt;Have you heard of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissugg.co.uk&quot; title=&quot;Uggs Boots&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Uggs Boots&lt;/a&gt;? As the famous brand from Austalia, now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissugg.co.uk&quot; title=&quot;ugg boots&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugg boots&lt;/a&gt; sale all over the world. Now UGG boots coming a new member-----&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-bailey-button-c-35.html&quot; title=&quot;UGG Bailey Button&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UGG Bailey Button&lt;/a&gt; for women. It is different from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-cardy-c-17.html&quot; title=&quot;ugg cardy boots&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugg cardy boots&lt;/a&gt;. Like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-classic-short-c-16.html&quot; title=&quot;ugg classic short&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugg classic short&lt;/a&gt;, it is a calf-height boot made from genuine twin-face sheepskin.The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-bailey-button-c-35.html&quot; title=&quot;Bailey Button&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bailey Button&lt;/a&gt; can either be worn up as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-classic-tall-c-18.html&quot; title=&quot;ugg classic tall&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugg classic tall&lt;/a&gt; or cuffed down adding a little variety as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-classic-mini-c-21.html&quot; title=&quot;ugg classic mini&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugg classic mini&lt;/a&gt; depending on your style. More information , welcome to look through our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kissugg.co.uk&quot; title=&quot;website&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;style type=&#8221;text/css&#8221;&gt;<br />&lt;!&#8211;<br />.STYLE1 {<br />	font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;<br />	font-size: 14px;<br />}<br />&#8211;&gt;<br />&lt;/style&gt;
<p class="STYLE1">Have you heard of <a href="http://www.kissugg.co.uk" title="Uggs Boots" rel="nofollow">Uggs Boots</a>? As the famous brand from Austalia, now <a href="http://www.kissugg.co.uk" title="ugg boots" rel="nofollow">ugg boots</a> sale all over the world. Now UGG boots coming a new member&#8212;&#8211;<a href="http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-bailey-button-c-35.html" title="UGG Bailey Button" rel="nofollow">UGG Bailey Button</a> for women. It is different from <a href="http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-cardy-c-17.html" title="ugg cardy boots" rel="nofollow">ugg cardy boots</a>. Like <a href="http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-classic-short-c-16.html" title="ugg classic short" rel="nofollow">ugg classic short</a>, it is a calf-height boot made from genuine twin-face sheepskin.The <a href="http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-bailey-button-c-35.html" title="Bailey Button" rel="nofollow">Bailey Button</a> can either be worn up as the <a href="http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-classic-tall-c-18.html" title="ugg classic tall" rel="nofollow">ugg classic tall</a> or cuffed down adding a little variety as <a href="http://www.kissugg.co.uk/ugg-classic-mini-c-21.html" title="ugg classic mini" rel="nofollow">ugg classic mini</a> depending on your style. More information , welcome to look through our <a href="http://www.kissugg.co.uk" title="website" rel="nofollow">website</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5617</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5617</guid>
		<description>Hi.. Your post got me thinking… What is more valuable for a software company (like facebook or flickr). 1,000 paying users or 100,000 non-paying users? What are your thoughts? View my blog post here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.purlem.com/blog/?p=57&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.purlem.com/blog/?p=57&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.. Your post got me thinking… What is more valuable for a software company (like facebook or flickr). 1,000 paying users or 100,000 non-paying users? What are your thoughts? View my blog post here: <a href="http://www.purlem.com/blog/?p=57" rel="nofollow">http://www.purlem.com/blog/?p=57</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henryyates</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5587</link>
		<dc:creator>henryyates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5587</guid>
		<description>I think you are right re 3-5%.&lt;br&gt;I guess the key is transitioning from a print to digital business model. At the moment it seems to be just about maintaining its print circulation at a higher price with a small increase in digital subscription. How this will continue to transition will be fascinating to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right re 3-5%.<br />I guess the key is transitioning from a print to digital business model. At the moment it seems to be just about maintaining its print circulation at a higher price with a small increase in digital subscription. How this will continue to transition will be fascinating to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5582</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5582</guid>
		<description>Thinking about it some more - 18% over a year on a small base like this isn&#039;t a very big increase.  At that rate it will be a long time before they are making sufficient sub revenues to move the needle on the overall business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking about it some more &#8211; 18% over a year on a small base like this isn&#39;t a very big increase.  At that rate it will be a long time before they are making sufficient sub revenues to move the needle on the overall business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5581</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5581</guid>
		<description>Thanks Henry - I think 10% would be high.  I have in my mind a benchmark of 3-5% conversion to paying for freemium models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Henry &#8211; I think 10% would be high.  I have in my mind a benchmark of 3-5% conversion to paying for freemium models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henryyates</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5580</link>
		<dc:creator>henryyates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5580</guid>
		<description>just reading the FT results - 18 per cent increase in paying online subscribers to 117,000. They have about 11m uniques, so they currently have about 1% paying. You would think this could reach at least 10% if not more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article6729606.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;(free link from The Times!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just reading the FT results &#8211; 18 per cent increase in paying online subscribers to 117,000. They have about 11m uniques, so they currently have about 1% paying. You would think this could reach at least 10% if not more.<br /><a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article6729606.ece" rel="nofollow">http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/&#8230;</a><br />(free link from The Times!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt_Schofield</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5577</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt_Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5577</guid>
		<description>Interesting blog item, again! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We make content providers pay. Then we deliver lots more services because they are mostly in drive time somewhere in the Greater South East (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/docs/160709%2520Cambridge%2520Network%2520brochure_v2%2520%28matrix%29.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/docs/160709%2...&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This seems to work fine for over 1,000 companies like ARM, CSR, etc. All of these companies are concerned to engage a brilliant community of technologists from around the world. I doubt 16,500+ techies from 6,500+ organizations would ALL have paid to become members - but I guess contacting those Users and figuring out how to serve them better is next. However we are always going to run some free stuff - check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cambridgebusinesslectures.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cambridgebusinesslectures.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We also do run a premium service for Founder Members, who pay quite a bit more to have the privilege of organizing Special Interest Group events for the rest. This makes for a pretty full calendar &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/docs/20%2520Jul%252009_CAMBRIDGE%2520events.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/docs/20%20Jul...&lt;/a&gt;. I blogged on why they do that recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/2009/07/technology-tribes.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/2009/07/tech...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matt Schofield&lt;br&gt;CEO &lt;br&gt;Cambridge Network</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting blog item, again! </p>
<p>We make content providers pay. Then we deliver lots more services because they are mostly in drive time somewhere in the Greater South East (<a href="http://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/docs/160709%2520Cambridge%2520Network%2520brochure_v2%2520%28matrix%29.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/docs/160709%2&#8230;</a>).</p>
<p>This seems to work fine for over 1,000 companies like ARM, CSR, etc. All of these companies are concerned to engage a brilliant community of technologists from around the world. I doubt 16,500+ techies from 6,500+ organizations would ALL have paid to become members &#8211; but I guess contacting those Users and figuring out how to serve them better is next. However we are always going to run some free stuff &#8211; check out <a href="http://www.cambridgebusinesslectures.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cambridgebusinesslectures.com/</a></p>
<p>We also do run a premium service for Founder Members, who pay quite a bit more to have the privilege of organizing Special Interest Group events for the rest. This makes for a pretty full calendar <a href="http://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/docs/20%2520Jul%252009_CAMBRIDGE%2520events.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/docs/20%20Jul&#8230;</a>. I blogged on why they do that recently <a href="http://blog.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/2009/07/technology-tribes.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/2009/07/tech&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Matt Schofield<br />CEO <br />Cambridge Network</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5576</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5576</guid>
		<description>Good point re the FT being different - I once heard someone say that people consume the FT intensively as the most efficient way to get the content they want which is totally different to the slow browse experience of most other papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point re the FT being different &#8211; I once heard someone say that people consume the FT intensively as the most efficient way to get the content they want which is totally different to the slow browse experience of most other papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5575</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/27/making-heavy-users-pay-the-optimum-freemium-model-for-news/#comment-5575</guid>
		<description>The FT uses a combination of both models: some of its content is available only to paying subscribers; as well as limiting the number of monthly article views per non-paying reader. &lt;a href=&quot;http://membership.ft.com/sitetour/index.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://membership.ft.com/sitetour/index.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Print media needs to be careful about copying the FT because of the particular characteristics of its readership. Most readers will find its content essential to their job; and they are unlikely to find a subscription a burden on their wallets, especially those who epanse them or have corporate subscriptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FT uses a combination of both models: some of its content is available only to paying subscribers; as well as limiting the number of monthly article views per non-paying reader. <a href="http://membership.ft.com/sitetour/index.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://membership.ft.com/sitetour/index.shtml</a></p>
<p>Print media needs to be careful about copying the FT because of the particular characteristics of its readership. Most readers will find its content essential to their job; and they are unlikely to find a subscription a burden on their wallets, especially those who epanse them or have corporate subscriptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.245 seconds -->

