<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reid Holffman&#8217;s three rules for investment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/04/22/reid-holffmans-three-rules-for-investment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/04/22/reid-holffmans-three-rules-for-investment/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Inma Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/04/22/reid-holffmans-three-rules-for-investment/#comment-5103</link>
		<dc:creator>Inma Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/04/22/reid-holffmans-three-rules-for-investment/#comment-5103</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been making the same point - in fact, yesterday I made it again at Geek&#039;n&#039;Rolla, for a while: product is everything. The revenue models based on &quot;being a club promoter&quot; (Facebook) that amalgamates audiences for a brand to advertise to them are over for me and for many. I have good research from inside the advertising industry that shows how ineffective this model is turning out for many brands and how poor the advertising figures of youtube are.
A company needs to sell a clear product, even if it is another vacuum cleaner, because consumers pay for items that deliver a direct and clear value to them or tend to demand services as freeware if they not.
I will be disseminating these figures in the next week or so as I only just got them yesterday at the EU conference that I&#039;m attending but the scary thing is that they prove how the advertising margins are decreasing and making it not even worth trying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been making the same point &#8211; in fact, yesterday I made it again at Geek&#8217;n'Rolla, for a while: product is everything. The revenue models based on &#8220;being a club promoter&#8221; (Facebook) that amalgamates audiences for a brand to advertise to them are over for me and for many. I have good research from inside the advertising industry that shows how ineffective this model is turning out for many brands and how poor the advertising figures of youtube are.<br />
A company needs to sell a clear product, even if it is another vacuum cleaner, because consumers pay for items that deliver a direct and clear value to them or tend to demand services as freeware if they not.<br />
I will be disseminating these figures in the next week or so as I only just got them yesterday at the EU conference that I&#8217;m attending but the scary thing is that they prove how the advertising margins are decreasing and making it not even worth trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henryyates</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/04/22/reid-holffmans-three-rules-for-investment/#comment-6319</link>
		<dc:creator>henryyates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/04/22/reid-holffmans-three-rules-for-investment/#comment-6319</guid>
		<description>As he says, I think with all the noise our there you need 1 as well as 2. This is the real nugget I took away from reading his post. Unless you are Google, I dont think a great product by itself will necessarily make it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As he says, I think with all the noise our there you need 1 as well as 2. This is the real nugget I took away from reading his post. Unless you are Google, I dont think a great product by itself will necessarily make it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henryyates</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/04/22/reid-holffmans-three-rules-for-investment/#comment-5087</link>
		<dc:creator>henryyates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/04/22/reid-holffmans-three-rules-for-investment/#comment-5087</guid>
		<description>As he says, I think with all the noise our there you need 1 as well as 2. This is the real nugget I took away from reading his post. Unless you are Google, I dont think a great product by itself will necessarily make it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As he says, I think with all the noise our there you need 1 as well as 2. This is the real nugget I took away from reading his post. Unless you are Google, I dont think a great product by itself will necessarily make it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.234 seconds -->

