<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social media: data versus interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Shared data services - the next frontier? &#124; The Equity Kicker</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4211</link>
		<dc:creator>Shared data services - the next frontier? &#124; The Equity Kicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4211</guid>
		<description>[...] 2005, do a search on &#8216;data is the Intel inside&#8217;, or you could even look at what I have written about it before), or worse, under the moniker &#8216;semantic web&#8216; Tim Berners-Lee has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2005, do a search on &#8216;data is the Intel inside&#8217;, or you could even look at what I have written about it before), or worse, under the moniker &#8216;semantic web&#8216; Tim Berners-Lee has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSweeney</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4085</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4085</guid>
		<description>How did online boards make money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did online boards make money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSweeney</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-11719</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-11719</guid>
		<description>How did online boards make money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did online boards make money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4024</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4024</guid>
		<description>&quot;Google and Facebook separately announced the general availability of their respective data portability programs on Thursday.&quot;
http://www.pcworld.com/article/154988/
Looks like Facebook are happy to allow data portability as long as the control it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Google and Facebook separately announced the general availability of their respective data portability programs on Thursday.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/154988/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcworld.com/article/154988/</a><br />
Looks like Facebook are happy to allow data portability as long as the control it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henryyates</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-11725</link>
		<dc:creator>henryyates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-11725</guid>
		<description>&quot;Google and Facebook separately announced the general availability of their respective data portability programs on Thursday.&quot;
http://www.pcworld.com/article/154988/
Looks like Facebook are happy to allow data portability as long as the control it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Google and Facebook separately announced the general availability of their respective data portability programs on Thursday.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/154988/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcworld.com/article/154988/</a><br />
Looks like Facebook are happy to allow data portability as long as the control it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4021</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4021</guid>
		<description>Some great comments guys, thank you.  I wonder if O&#039;Reilly doesn&#039;t really think about money when he assesses technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great comments guys, thank you.  I wonder if O&#8217;Reilly doesn&#8217;t really think about money when he assesses technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-11720</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-11720</guid>
		<description>Some great comments guys, thank you.  I wonder if O&#039;Reilly doesn&#039;t really think about money when he assesses technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great comments guys, thank you.  I wonder if O&#8217;Reilly doesn&#8217;t really think about money when he assesses technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4011</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4011</guid>
		<description>I do not think Xerox made any money out of inventing ethernet (or the modern computer for that matter.

On the other hand Altavista didn&#039;t make Google&#039;s money from search tech even when they had near monopoly (even in relative terms of audience)... so there is no sure thing.

But if you want a good example of sharing sale of data and the best of interfaces, the prize has to go to iTunes. Amazon can beat them (or level them) with a price war. Apple&#039;s monopolistic prices have been bad for consumers but good for Apple&#039;s medium term profit. I don&#039;t see Amazon pulling off the same trick with the Kindle but there may be other vertical systems out there where data, interface and platform form a virtuous circle of great profit. I hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think Xerox made any money out of inventing ethernet (or the modern computer for that matter.</p>
<p>On the other hand Altavista didn&#8217;t make Google&#8217;s money from search tech even when they had near monopoly (even in relative terms of audience)&#8230; so there is no sure thing.</p>
<p>But if you want a good example of sharing sale of data and the best of interfaces, the prize has to go to iTunes. Amazon can beat them (or level them) with a price war. Apple&#8217;s monopolistic prices have been bad for consumers but good for Apple&#8217;s medium term profit. I don&#8217;t see Amazon pulling off the same trick with the Kindle but there may be other vertical systems out there where data, interface and platform form a virtuous circle of great profit. I hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-11722</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-11722</guid>
		<description>I do not think Xerox made any money out of inventing ethernet (or the modern computer for that matter.

On the other hand Altavista didn&#039;t make Google&#039;s money from search tech even when they had near monopoly (even in relative terms of audience)... so there is no sure thing.

But if you want a good example of sharing sale of data and the best of interfaces, the prize has to go to iTunes. Amazon can beat them (or level them) with a price war. Apple&#039;s monopolistic prices have been bad for consumers but good for Apple&#039;s medium term profit. I don&#039;t see Amazon pulling off the same trick with the Kindle but there may be other vertical systems out there where data, interface and platform form a virtuous circle of great profit. I hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think Xerox made any money out of inventing ethernet (or the modern computer for that matter.</p>
<p>On the other hand Altavista didn&#8217;t make Google&#8217;s money from search tech even when they had near monopoly (even in relative terms of audience)&#8230; so there is no sure thing.</p>
<p>But if you want a good example of sharing sale of data and the best of interfaces, the prize has to go to iTunes. Amazon can beat them (or level them) with a price war. Apple&#8217;s monopolistic prices have been bad for consumers but good for Apple&#8217;s medium term profit. I don&#8217;t see Amazon pulling off the same trick with the Kindle but there may be other vertical systems out there where data, interface and platform form a virtuous circle of great profit. I hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4010</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/12/03/social-media-data-versus-interface/#comment-4010</guid>
		<description>I had a mull over this with respect to Twitter a few weeks on my blog and suggested that Twitter is in a difficult monetisation space as its own share of traffic generated in Twitter (i.e. the amount of traffic through a proprietary interface) is low and falling. If they do nothing about this then they will be forced to monetise through selling access to its API. This seems a &quot;fair&quot; exchange - and arguably the one likely to see the most success - but would certainly redefine the modus operandi in the web 2.0 world of free exchange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a mull over this with respect to Twitter a few weeks on my blog and suggested that Twitter is in a difficult monetisation space as its own share of traffic generated in Twitter (i.e. the amount of traffic through a proprietary interface) is low and falling. If they do nothing about this then they will be forced to monetise through selling access to its API. This seems a &#8220;fair&#8221; exchange &#8211; and arguably the one likely to see the most success &#8211; but would certainly redefine the modus operandi in the web 2.0 world of free exchange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.257 seconds -->

