<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The failure of BT Vision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/09/15/the-failure-of-bt-vision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/09/15/the-failure-of-bt-vision/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Abott</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/09/15/the-failure-of-bt-vision/#comment-6887</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Abott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/09/15/the-failure-of-bt-vision/#comment-6887</guid>
		<description>yeh, i thought it would be a bit better than it is though x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeh, i thought it would be a bit better than it is though x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weight loss diets</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/09/15/the-failure-of-bt-vision/#comment-4392</link>
		<dc:creator>weight loss diets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/09/15/the-failure-of-bt-vision/#comment-4392</guid>
		<description>Many now interests how correctly to eat. The number of the people dissatisfied with the figure or health recently has increased and, as consequence, trying to get rid of excess weight. You should pick up a diet approaching you, and also learn to make correctly balanced diet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many now interests how correctly to eat. The number of the people dissatisfied with the figure or health recently has increased and, as consequence, trying to get rid of excess weight. You should pick up a diet approaching you, and also learn to make correctly balanced diet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/09/15/the-failure-of-bt-vision/#comment-3420</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/09/15/the-failure-of-bt-vision/#comment-3420</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re spot on - their proposition (without football or other event rights) just isn&#039;t very strong.  Virgin and Sky have enormous content and channel breadth, whereas BT&#039;s offer comes across as a thin veneer on top of Freeview (and Freeview with a good PVR is a pretty attractive and free option).  Tiscali (which I think sells its product a lot better) has even fewer subscribers apparently.

I think for a lot of us &quot;sit back&quot; style TV and &quot;lean forward&quot; style YouTube videos are still distinct, but a combination of the two (maybe some recommended YouTube clips after I&#039;ve watched a TV drama) might tempt users into sampling.  It would also make sense to me as a user that that service was provided by my ISP.  Otherwise perhaps in most people&#039;s minds BT is a telephony provider and ISP, and that&#039;s just a difficult thing to change...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re spot on &#8211; their proposition (without football or other event rights) just isn&#8217;t very strong.  Virgin and Sky have enormous content and channel breadth, whereas BT&#8217;s offer comes across as a thin veneer on top of Freeview (and Freeview with a good PVR is a pretty attractive and free option).  Tiscali (which I think sells its product a lot better) has even fewer subscribers apparently.</p>
<p>I think for a lot of us &#8220;sit back&#8221; style TV and &#8220;lean forward&#8221; style YouTube videos are still distinct, but a combination of the two (maybe some recommended YouTube clips after I&#8217;ve watched a TV drama) might tempt users into sampling.  It would also make sense to me as a user that that service was provided by my ISP.  Otherwise perhaps in most people&#8217;s minds BT is a telephony provider and ISP, and that&#8217;s just a difficult thing to change&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/09/15/the-failure-of-bt-vision/#comment-11556</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/09/15/the-failure-of-bt-vision/#comment-11556</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re spot on - their proposition (without football or other event rights) just isn&#039;t very strong.  Virgin and Sky have enormous content and channel breadth, whereas BT&#039;s offer comes across as a thin veneer on top of Freeview (and Freeview with a good PVR is a pretty attractive and free option).  Tiscali (which I think sells its product a lot better) has even fewer subscribers apparently.

I think for a lot of us &quot;sit back&quot; style TV and &quot;lean forward&quot; style YouTube videos are still distinct, but a combination of the two (maybe some recommended YouTube clips after I&#039;ve watched a TV drama) might tempt users into sampling.  It would also make sense to me as a user that that service was provided by my ISP.  Otherwise perhaps in most people&#039;s minds BT is a telephony provider and ISP, and that&#039;s just a difficult thing to change...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re spot on &#8211; their proposition (without football or other event rights) just isn&#8217;t very strong.  Virgin and Sky have enormous content and channel breadth, whereas BT&#8217;s offer comes across as a thin veneer on top of Freeview (and Freeview with a good PVR is a pretty attractive and free option).  Tiscali (which I think sells its product a lot better) has even fewer subscribers apparently.</p>
<p>I think for a lot of us &#8220;sit back&#8221; style TV and &#8220;lean forward&#8221; style YouTube videos are still distinct, but a combination of the two (maybe some recommended YouTube clips after I&#8217;ve watched a TV drama) might tempt users into sampling.  It would also make sense to me as a user that that service was provided by my ISP.  Otherwise perhaps in most people&#8217;s minds BT is a telephony provider and ISP, and that&#8217;s just a difficult thing to change&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.231 seconds -->

