<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There is space for innovation in search, but challenging Google will be tough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/04/there-is-space-for-innovation-in-search-but-challenging-google-will-be-tough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/04/there-is-space-for-innovation-in-search-but-challenging-google-will-be-tough/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/04/there-is-space-for-innovation-in-search-but-challenging-google-will-be-tough/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/?p=841#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>I think Google is most concerned now about the source of its searches - if most searches start to originate through social media, or mobile phone, or the next Facebook, can Google be taken out of the loop at source?  In other words, just by it being easier to do something else?

I remember when I first used Google, it was wholly because of the quality of the search results.  Now, it&#039;s more about ubiquity (they&#039;re in the browser, on my blackberry start page, generally ingrained in my head as a starting place).  But that state of omnipresence isn&#039;t impossible to attack online, because of the huge shifts in traffic that Facebook, the iPhone and so on can command 

Still, those shifts rely on great products/services, so the premise is the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google is most concerned now about the source of its searches &#8211; if most searches start to originate through social media, or mobile phone, or the next Facebook, can Google be taken out of the loop at source?  In other words, just by it being easier to do something else?</p>
<p>I remember when I first used Google, it was wholly because of the quality of the search results.  Now, it&#8217;s more about ubiquity (they&#8217;re in the browser, on my blackberry start page, generally ingrained in my head as a starting place).  But that state of omnipresence isn&#8217;t impossible to attack online, because of the huge shifts in traffic that Facebook, the iPhone and so on can command </p>
<p>Still, those shifts rely on great products/services, so the premise is the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/04/there-is-space-for-innovation-in-search-but-challenging-google-will-be-tough/#comment-11453</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/?p=841#comment-11453</guid>
		<description>I think Google is most concerned now about the source of its searches - if most searches start to originate through social media, or mobile phone, or the next Facebook, can Google be taken out of the loop at source?  In other words, just by it being easier to do something else?

I remember when I first used Google, it was wholly because of the quality of the search results.  Now, it&#039;s more about ubiquity (they&#039;re in the browser, on my blackberry start page, generally ingrained in my head as a starting place).  But that state of omnipresence isn&#039;t impossible to attack online, because of the huge shifts in traffic that Facebook, the iPhone and so on can command 

Still, those shifts rely on great products/services, so the premise is the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google is most concerned now about the source of its searches &#8211; if most searches start to originate through social media, or mobile phone, or the next Facebook, can Google be taken out of the loop at source?  In other words, just by it being easier to do something else?</p>
<p>I remember when I first used Google, it was wholly because of the quality of the search results.  Now, it&#8217;s more about ubiquity (they&#8217;re in the browser, on my blackberry start page, generally ingrained in my head as a starting place).  But that state of omnipresence isn&#8217;t impossible to attack online, because of the huge shifts in traffic that Facebook, the iPhone and so on can command </p>
<p>Still, those shifts rely on great products/services, so the premise is the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/04/there-is-space-for-innovation-in-search-but-challenging-google-will-be-tough/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/?p=841#comment-3009</guid>
		<description>I agree 100%. For people who want to read up on the topic of how to compete in this kind of situation, I suggest you have a look at &quot;blue ocean strategy&quot;:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Blue-Ocean-Strategy-Uncontested-Competition/dp/1591396190

Great book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%. For people who want to read up on the topic of how to compete in this kind of situation, I suggest you have a look at &#8220;blue ocean strategy&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Blue-Ocean-Strategy-Uncontested-Competition/dp/1591396190" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.co.uk/Blue-Ocean-Strategy-Uncontested-Competition/dp/1591396190</a></p>
<p>Great book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/08/04/there-is-space-for-innovation-in-search-but-challenging-google-will-be-tough/#comment-11452</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/?p=841#comment-11452</guid>
		<description>I agree 100%. For people who want to read up on the topic of how to compete in this kind of situation, I suggest you have a look at &quot;blue ocean strategy&quot;:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Blue-Ocean-Strategy-Uncontested-Competition/dp/1591396190

Great book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%. For people who want to read up on the topic of how to compete in this kind of situation, I suggest you have a look at &#8220;blue ocean strategy&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Blue-Ocean-Strategy-Uncontested-Competition/dp/1591396190" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.co.uk/Blue-Ocean-Strategy-Uncontested-Competition/dp/1591396190</a></p>
<p>Great book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.227 seconds -->

