<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The difference between media and comms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: best online bingo site   </title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>best online bingo site   </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>use a variety of communications methodologies which complement each other in order to meet business objectives. But if you’re not quite sure which direction to follow, here’s an elementary rundown of the differences between these main three areas of communications.Media is all about delivering an enjoyable experience to the consumer whilst communications is all about delivering a highly efficient service. The price of entertainment is arguably going up whilst the price of comms is undeniably heading towards zero.Both the church and technology are ever changing. Churches have to work strategically to maximize its staff, resources, and work processes; otherwise, they&#039;ll likely experience duplication of effort, inefficiency, excessive expenditures. This is more true with IT, Communications and Media than any other area of the church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>use a variety of communications methodologies which complement each other in order to meet business objectives. But if you’re not quite sure which direction to follow, here’s an elementary rundown of the differences between these main three areas of communications.Media is all about delivering an enjoyable experience to the consumer whilst communications is all about delivering a highly efficient service. The price of entertainment is arguably going up whilst the price of comms is undeniably heading towards zero.Both the church and technology are ever changing. Churches have to work strategically to maximize its staff, resources, and work processes; otherwise, they&#39;ll likely experience duplication of effort, inefficiency, excessive expenditures. This is more true with IT, Communications and Media than any other area of the church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-2833</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-2833</guid>
		<description>Jo - good to hear from you!  And also nice to see you are still a good year or two ahead of me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jo &#8211; good to hear from you!  And also nice to see you are still a good year or two ahead of me <img src='http://www.theequitykicker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-11393</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-11393</guid>
		<description>Jo - good to hear from you!  And also nice to see you are still a good year or two ahead of me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jo &#8211; good to hear from you!  And also nice to see you are still a good year or two ahead of me <img src='http://www.theequitykicker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Rabin</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-2832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Rabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-2832</guid>
		<description>Having had experience both of working for an operator and for a content provider (who for most of its life was a kind of operator as well) I think the contrast you make between the competencies needed to be a successful media company and those needed to be a successful telco are very much to the point.

However, and of course, operators don&#039;t want to be &quot;dumb bit pipes&quot;. They want to climb the value chain. They may suffer from &quot;revenue envy&quot;. They may like the lifestyles they have today and want to hang on to them. It could be that being just a bit pipe is, given your observation about prices dropping to zero, a bit of an unrewarding thing. 

I think there are opportunities not to be dumb bit pipes that don&#039;t involve transforming into media companies but that do require them to think differently about their businesses. The problem may be that most of these are not uniquely differentiable propositions in the way that media or content is, or can be, and hence don&#039;t represent a move away from commoditized propositions.

On the other hand, I think that the BBC iPlayer discussion reminds us that Content Provider business models are disconnected from the cost implications of their actions. The cost of infrastructure operation and upgrade clearly needs to be borne somewhere, and there is almost certainly a need for discussion as to whether operator concerns about the sustainability of the model for the &quot;core&quot; is a real economic concern, or whether it is a community &quot;crying wolf&quot; in pain at the erosion of its license to print money. 

It would be interesting to know more of the facts.

Jo

[Incidentally, I made some similar kinds of remarks about operator competencies a little while ago at http://www.dev.mobi/blog/if-not-now-when.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had experience both of working for an operator and for a content provider (who for most of its life was a kind of operator as well) I think the contrast you make between the competencies needed to be a successful media company and those needed to be a successful telco are very much to the point.</p>
<p>However, and of course, operators don&#8217;t want to be &#8220;dumb bit pipes&#8221;. They want to climb the value chain. They may suffer from &#8220;revenue envy&#8221;. They may like the lifestyles they have today and want to hang on to them. It could be that being just a bit pipe is, given your observation about prices dropping to zero, a bit of an unrewarding thing. </p>
<p>I think there are opportunities not to be dumb bit pipes that don&#8217;t involve transforming into media companies but that do require them to think differently about their businesses. The problem may be that most of these are not uniquely differentiable propositions in the way that media or content is, or can be, and hence don&#8217;t represent a move away from commoditized propositions.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I think that the BBC iPlayer discussion reminds us that Content Provider business models are disconnected from the cost implications of their actions. The cost of infrastructure operation and upgrade clearly needs to be borne somewhere, and there is almost certainly a need for discussion as to whether operator concerns about the sustainability of the model for the &#8220;core&#8221; is a real economic concern, or whether it is a community &#8220;crying wolf&#8221; in pain at the erosion of its license to print money. </p>
<p>It would be interesting to know more of the facts.</p>
<p>Jo</p>
<p>[Incidentally, I made some similar kinds of remarks about operator competencies a little while ago at <a href="http://www.dev.mobi/blog/if-not-now-when." rel="nofollow">http://www.dev.mobi/blog/if-not-now-when.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Rabin</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-11396</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Rabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-11396</guid>
		<description>Having had experience both of working for an operator and for a content provider (who for most of its life was a kind of operator as well) I think the contrast you make between the competencies needed to be a successful media company and those needed to be a successful telco are very much to the point.

However, and of course, operators don&#039;t want to be &quot;dumb bit pipes&quot;. They want to climb the value chain. They may suffer from &quot;revenue envy&quot;. They may like the lifestyles they have today and want to hang on to them. It could be that being just a bit pipe is, given your observation about prices dropping to zero, a bit of an unrewarding thing. 

I think there are opportunities not to be dumb bit pipes that don&#039;t involve transforming into media companies but that do require them to think differently about their businesses. The problem may be that most of these are not uniquely differentiable propositions in the way that media or content is, or can be, and hence don&#039;t represent a move away from commoditized propositions.

On the other hand, I think that the BBC iPlayer discussion reminds us that Content Provider business models are disconnected from the cost implications of their actions. The cost of infrastructure operation and upgrade clearly needs to be borne somewhere, and there is almost certainly a need for discussion as to whether operator concerns about the sustainability of the model for the &quot;core&quot; is a real economic concern, or whether it is a community &quot;crying wolf&quot; in pain at the erosion of its license to print money. 

It would be interesting to know more of the facts.

Jo

[Incidentally, I made some similar kinds of remarks about operator competencies a little while ago at http://www.dev.mobi/blog/if-not-now-when.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had experience both of working for an operator and for a content provider (who for most of its life was a kind of operator as well) I think the contrast you make between the competencies needed to be a successful media company and those needed to be a successful telco are very much to the point.</p>
<p>However, and of course, operators don&#8217;t want to be &#8220;dumb bit pipes&#8221;. They want to climb the value chain. They may suffer from &#8220;revenue envy&#8221;. They may like the lifestyles they have today and want to hang on to them. It could be that being just a bit pipe is, given your observation about prices dropping to zero, a bit of an unrewarding thing. </p>
<p>I think there are opportunities not to be dumb bit pipes that don&#8217;t involve transforming into media companies but that do require them to think differently about their businesses. The problem may be that most of these are not uniquely differentiable propositions in the way that media or content is, or can be, and hence don&#8217;t represent a move away from commoditized propositions.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I think that the BBC iPlayer discussion reminds us that Content Provider business models are disconnected from the cost implications of their actions. The cost of infrastructure operation and upgrade clearly needs to be borne somewhere, and there is almost certainly a need for discussion as to whether operator concerns about the sustainability of the model for the &#8220;core&#8221; is a real economic concern, or whether it is a community &#8220;crying wolf&#8221; in pain at the erosion of its license to print money. </p>
<p>It would be interesting to know more of the facts.</p>
<p>Jo</p>
<p>[Incidentally, I made some similar kinds of remarks about operator competencies a little while ago at <a href="http://www.dev.mobi/blog/if-not-now-when." rel="nofollow">http://www.dev.mobi/blog/if-not-now-when.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-2831</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-2831</guid>
		<description>James - good point, there is definitely value in the information created by socnets, even if they are purely comms focused.  We need a bit of innovation to figure out how to harvest it though.

Chris - whilst companies understand the need for the sort of cultural change you are describing, they are poor at implementing it.  That is why they fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James &#8211; good point, there is definitely value in the information created by socnets, even if they are purely comms focused.  We need a bit of innovation to figure out how to harvest it though.</p>
<p>Chris &#8211; whilst companies understand the need for the sort of cultural change you are describing, they are poor at implementing it.  That is why they fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-11397</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-11397</guid>
		<description>James - good point, there is definitely value in the information created by socnets, even if they are purely comms focused.  We need a bit of innovation to figure out how to harvest it though.

Chris - whilst companies understand the need for the sort of cultural change you are describing, they are poor at implementing it.  That is why they fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James &#8211; good point, there is definitely value in the information created by socnets, even if they are purely comms focused.  We need a bit of innovation to figure out how to harvest it though.</p>
<p>Chris &#8211; whilst companies understand the need for the sort of cultural change you are describing, they are poor at implementing it.  That is why they fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris_h</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>chris_h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more. My background is magazine publishing and I made the jump over to mobile content three years ago. The majority of the moco firms are staffed by techies who know their symbian from their javas but don&#039;t understand that content, on its own, is not enough. They think brand, positioning, values, entertainment and voice are all gooey fluff that keeps us marketing bods in Ivy lunches :-) Whilst I agree that there is a huge element of wibble in my profession, one only has to look at massive value built up by IP focused business&#039; to realise that done properly, its a goldmine. 

I&#039;ve recently come to realise that its not too late for the carriers (and for carriers read technology based firms generally) to change their approach, they still control the customer, its just that they don&#039;t think that way. 

Culturally it would be like asking a bunch of magic circle lawyers to become drama teachers and &quot;act like trees&quot;, they&#039;re just not wired that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more. My background is magazine publishing and I made the jump over to mobile content three years ago. The majority of the moco firms are staffed by techies who know their symbian from their javas but don&#8217;t understand that content, on its own, is not enough. They think brand, positioning, values, entertainment and voice are all gooey fluff that keeps us marketing bods in Ivy lunches <img src='http://www.theequitykicker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Whilst I agree that there is a huge element of wibble in my profession, one only has to look at massive value built up by IP focused business&#8217; to realise that done properly, its a goldmine. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve recently come to realise that its not too late for the carriers (and for carriers read technology based firms generally) to change their approach, they still control the customer, its just that they don&#8217;t think that way. </p>
<p>Culturally it would be like asking a bunch of magic circle lawyers to become drama teachers and &#8220;act like trees&#8221;, they&#8217;re just not wired that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris_h</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-11394</link>
		<dc:creator>chris_h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-11394</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more. My background is magazine publishing and I made the jump over to mobile content three years ago. The majority of the moco firms are staffed by techies who know their symbian from their javas but don&#039;t understand that content, on its own, is not enough. They think brand, positioning, values, entertainment and voice are all gooey fluff that keeps us marketing bods in Ivy lunches :-) Whilst I agree that there is a huge element of wibble in my profession, one only has to look at massive value built up by IP focused business&#039; to realise that done properly, its a goldmine. 

I&#039;ve recently come to realise that its not too late for the carriers (and for carriers read technology based firms generally) to change their approach, they still control the customer, its just that they don&#039;t think that way. 

Culturally it would be like asking a bunch of magic circle lawyers to become drama teachers and &quot;act like trees&quot;, they&#039;re just not wired that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more. My background is magazine publishing and I made the jump over to mobile content three years ago. The majority of the moco firms are staffed by techies who know their symbian from their javas but don&#8217;t understand that content, on its own, is not enough. They think brand, positioning, values, entertainment and voice are all gooey fluff that keeps us marketing bods in Ivy lunches <img src='http://www.theequitykicker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Whilst I agree that there is a huge element of wibble in my profession, one only has to look at massive value built up by IP focused business&#8217; to realise that done properly, its a goldmine. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve recently come to realise that its not too late for the carriers (and for carriers read technology based firms generally) to change their approach, they still control the customer, its just that they don&#8217;t think that way. </p>
<p>Culturally it would be like asking a bunch of magic circle lawyers to become drama teachers and &#8220;act like trees&#8221;, they&#8217;re just not wired that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Penman</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-2829</link>
		<dc:creator>James Penman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/07/09/the-difference-between-media-and-comms/#comment-2829</guid>
		<description>Certain niche social networks, eg travel/tourism, would appear to have massive value as platforms for information.  The value lying in communication and information as opposed to communication and entertainment.  Granted, this depends on the character of the social network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certain niche social networks, eg travel/tourism, would appear to have massive value as platforms for information.  The value lying in communication and information as opposed to communication and entertainment.  Granted, this depends on the character of the social network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.236 seconds -->

