<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Berners-Lee on the new-new-thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>When I have seen Tim (and others) talk with passion about the semantic web it all makes sense- however the drive seems entirely intellectual. Getting the tools that will let the end user shape the experience and services the semantic web will afford seems to be a long way from their activity.

As a recovering academic myself I recognise the research then develop business model - and understand its flaws. It is a recurrent issue. I, and many others,  were researching collaborative activity over the internet in the 90&#039;s in both enterprise and public service activities it did seem that we were working in an environment where there wasn&#039;t much interest outside the research field (the millennium bug was a good excuse to avoid IS departments considering any change).

What would now be considered web2.0 state of the art (like yesterday&#039;s mention of Huddle) were custom and practice. No sour grapes - my business model was getting the next research grant.

Presumably lurking somewhere in semantic web the next decades thing may be lurking. The other aspect is the notion of URIs and the &quot;web of things&quot;. Surely the consumer end of the web of things will not begin and end with NikePlus. In fact, I have a product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I have seen Tim (and others) talk with passion about the semantic web it all makes sense- however the drive seems entirely intellectual. Getting the tools that will let the end user shape the experience and services the semantic web will afford seems to be a long way from their activity.</p>
<p>As a recovering academic myself I recognise the research then develop business model &#8211; and understand its flaws. It is a recurrent issue. I, and many others,  were researching collaborative activity over the internet in the 90&#8242;s in both enterprise and public service activities it did seem that we were working in an environment where there wasn&#8217;t much interest outside the research field (the millennium bug was a good excuse to avoid IS departments considering any change).</p>
<p>What would now be considered web2.0 state of the art (like yesterday&#8217;s mention of Huddle) were custom and practice. No sour grapes &#8211; my business model was getting the next research grant.</p>
<p>Presumably lurking somewhere in semantic web the next decades thing may be lurking. The other aspect is the notion of URIs and the &#8220;web of things&#8221;. Surely the consumer end of the web of things will not begin and end with NikePlus. In fact, I have a product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-11280</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-11280</guid>
		<description>When I have seen Tim (and others) talk with passion about the semantic web it all makes sense- however the drive seems entirely intellectual. Getting the tools that will let the end user shape the experience and services the semantic web will afford seems to be a long way from their activity.

As a recovering academic myself I recognise the research then develop business model - and understand its flaws. It is a recurrent issue. I, and many others,  were researching collaborative activity over the internet in the 90&#039;s in both enterprise and public service activities it did seem that we were working in an environment where there wasn&#039;t much interest outside the research field (the millennium bug was a good excuse to avoid IS departments considering any change).

What would now be considered web2.0 state of the art (like yesterday&#039;s mention of Huddle) were custom and practice. No sour grapes - my business model was getting the next research grant.

Presumably lurking somewhere in semantic web the next decades thing may be lurking. The other aspect is the notion of URIs and the &quot;web of things&quot;. Surely the consumer end of the web of things will not begin and end with NikePlus. In fact, I have a product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I have seen Tim (and others) talk with passion about the semantic web it all makes sense- however the drive seems entirely intellectual. Getting the tools that will let the end user shape the experience and services the semantic web will afford seems to be a long way from their activity.</p>
<p>As a recovering academic myself I recognise the research then develop business model &#8211; and understand its flaws. It is a recurrent issue. I, and many others,  were researching collaborative activity over the internet in the 90&#8242;s in both enterprise and public service activities it did seem that we were working in an environment where there wasn&#8217;t much interest outside the research field (the millennium bug was a good excuse to avoid IS departments considering any change).</p>
<p>What would now be considered web2.0 state of the art (like yesterday&#8217;s mention of Huddle) were custom and practice. No sour grapes &#8211; my business model was getting the next research grant.</p>
<p>Presumably lurking somewhere in semantic web the next decades thing may be lurking. The other aspect is the notion of URIs and the &#8220;web of things&#8221;. Surely the consumer end of the web of things will not begin and end with NikePlus. In fact, I have a product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>Good point Terry. My mistake.  I will add a link when I&#039;m next in front of my PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Terry. My mistake.  I will add a link when I&#8217;m next in front of my PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-11279</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-11279</guid>
		<description>Good point Terry. My mistake.  I will add a link when I&#039;m next in front of my PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Terry. My mistake.  I will add a link when I&#8217;m next in front of my PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-1885</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-1885</guid>
		<description>Is there a link to the TBL article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a link to the TBL article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrycojones</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-11278</link>
		<dc:creator>terrycojones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/30/berners-lee-on-the-new-new-thing/#comment-11278</guid>
		<description>Is there a link to the TBL article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a link to the TBL article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.232 seconds -->

