<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook maturing as a platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcheck on the Facebook platform - negative outlook &#171; The Equity Kicker</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcheck on the Facebook platform - negative outlook &#171; The Equity Kicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>[...] couple of weeks ago I wrote that Facebook is maturing as a platform - a post I wrote in response to uproar from the developer community about how Facebook was making [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couple of weeks ago I wrote that Facebook is maturing as a platform &#8211; a post I wrote in response to uproar from the developer community about how Facebook was making [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1852</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1852</guid>
		<description>Tks Josh.  I agree with your second paragraph, although I somehow suspect that apps commissioned by brands will not turn out to be high engagement, or not that many of them anyway.  I would guess the model is more likely to evolve along the lines of product placement or in-game advertising, where brands compete to become associated with high quality content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tks Josh.  I agree with your second paragraph, although I somehow suspect that apps commissioned by brands will not turn out to be high engagement, or not that many of them anyway.  I would guess the model is more likely to evolve along the lines of product placement or in-game advertising, where brands compete to become associated with high quality content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-11263</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-11263</guid>
		<description>Tks Josh.  I agree with your second paragraph, although I somehow suspect that apps commissioned by brands will not turn out to be high engagement, or not that many of them anyway.  I would guess the model is more likely to evolve along the lines of product placement or in-game advertising, where brands compete to become associated with high quality content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tks Josh.  I agree with your second paragraph, although I somehow suspect that apps commissioned by brands will not turn out to be high engagement, or not that many of them anyway.  I would guess the model is more likely to evolve along the lines of product placement or in-game advertising, where brands compete to become associated with high quality content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua March</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1849</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1849</guid>
		<description>Hi Nic,

Good post - it&#039;s been really good to watch Facebook tighten up its spam rules over the past couple of months, not just as a user, but also from a business perspective. As you say, making it harder for spammy, low engagement apps also makes it better for high engagement apps - with obvious benefits for companies or communities who provide this. 

I&#039;d also point out that advert monetisation isn&#039;t the only route - click-through rates will always be low on social network applications, and in fact the more you engage a user the less likely they are to click away. However, this engagement can be of huge value to brands in and of itself, and I expect that we&#039;ll see many more sponsored apps and applications created exclusively for brands. 

Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nic,</p>
<p>Good post &#8211; it&#8217;s been really good to watch Facebook tighten up its spam rules over the past couple of months, not just as a user, but also from a business perspective. As you say, making it harder for spammy, low engagement apps also makes it better for high engagement apps &#8211; with obvious benefits for companies or communities who provide this. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d also point out that advert monetisation isn&#8217;t the only route &#8211; click-through rates will always be low on social network applications, and in fact the more you engage a user the less likely they are to click away. However, this engagement can be of huge value to brands in and of itself, and I expect that we&#8217;ll see many more sponsored apps and applications created exclusively for brands. </p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua March</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-11262</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-11262</guid>
		<description>Hi Nic,

Good post - it&#039;s been really good to watch Facebook tighten up its spam rules over the past couple of months, not just as a user, but also from a business perspective. As you say, making it harder for spammy, low engagement apps also makes it better for high engagement apps - with obvious benefits for companies or communities who provide this. 

I&#039;d also point out that advert monetisation isn&#039;t the only route - click-through rates will always be low on social network applications, and in fact the more you engage a user the less likely they are to click away. However, this engagement can be of huge value to brands in and of itself, and I expect that we&#039;ll see many more sponsored apps and applications created exclusively for brands. 

Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nic,</p>
<p>Good post &#8211; it&#8217;s been really good to watch Facebook tighten up its spam rules over the past couple of months, not just as a user, but also from a business perspective. As you say, making it harder for spammy, low engagement apps also makes it better for high engagement apps &#8211; with obvious benefits for companies or communities who provide this. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d also point out that advert monetisation isn&#8217;t the only route &#8211; click-through rates will always be low on social network applications, and in fact the more you engage a user the less likely they are to click away. However, this engagement can be of huge value to brands in and of itself, and I expect that we&#8217;ll see many more sponsored apps and applications created exclusively for brands. </p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantin Ferseta</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantin Ferseta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>nice post.

indeed, after several years of building the trafic via honest-or-not mailings, maybe this movement will convince some original heavy users (that left) to come back. After all, the fashion hype will start to dissapear, so they must keep increase the added value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post.</p>
<p>indeed, after several years of building the trafic via honest-or-not mailings, maybe this movement will convince some original heavy users (that left) to come back. After all, the fashion hype will start to dissapear, so they must keep increase the added value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantin Ferseta</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-11261</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantin Ferseta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-11261</guid>
		<description>nice post.

indeed, after several years of building the trafic via honest-or-not mailings, maybe this movement will convince some original heavy users (that left) to come back. After all, the fashion hype will start to dissapear, so they must keep increase the added value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post.</p>
<p>indeed, after several years of building the trafic via honest-or-not mailings, maybe this movement will convince some original heavy users (that left) to come back. After all, the fashion hype will start to dissapear, so they must keep increase the added value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook &#187; Facebook maturing as a platform</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1818</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook &#187; Facebook maturing as a platform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1818</guid>
		<description>[...] nic wrote an interesting post today on Facebook maturing as a platformHere&#8217;s a quick excerptI think what we are witnessing here is Facebook growing up. The future of Facebook apps, and probably the company itself depends on our collective ability to produce the kind of high engagement apps that will keep us all coming back for &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nic wrote an interesting post today on Facebook maturing as a platformHere&#8217;s a quick excerptI think what we are witnessing here is Facebook growing up. The future of Facebook apps, and probably the company itself depends on our collective ability to produce the kind of high engagement apps that will keep us all coming back for &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>Tks Alan - I agree, nothing new here in terms of analysis, the noteworthy thing is that the world at large is starting to buy into it.

And from what I&#039;ve heard I would guess that the mean CPM is well below $0.15</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tks Alan &#8211; I agree, nothing new here in terms of analysis, the noteworthy thing is that the world at large is starting to buy into it.</p>
<p>And from what I&#8217;ve heard I would guess that the mean CPM is well below $0.15</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-11260</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/24/facebook-maturing-as-a-platform/#comment-11260</guid>
		<description>Tks Alan - I agree, nothing new here in terms of analysis, the noteworthy thing is that the world at large is starting to buy into it.

And from what I&#039;ve heard I would guess that the mean CPM is well below $0.15</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tks Alan &#8211; I agree, nothing new here in terms of analysis, the noteworthy thing is that the world at large is starting to buy into it.</p>
<p>And from what I&#8217;ve heard I would guess that the mean CPM is well below $0.15</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.244 seconds -->

