<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joost and Babelgum struggling for content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/07/joost-and-babelgum-struggling-for-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/07/joost-and-babelgum-struggling-for-content/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: givememedia</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/07/joost-and-babelgum-struggling-for-content/#comment-1726</link>
		<dc:creator>givememedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/07/joost-and-babelgum-struggling-for-content/#comment-1726</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Nic - having worked with some of Joost and Babelgum&#039;s competitors I was interested to see how their struggle for content is playing out. I agree that today&#039;s broadcasters find themselves in a tough position and without content they will continue to struggle. I&#039;ll be interested to see how the major newspapers play into internet video, and carve out their space. Most now have robust video services and some, like the FT, are clearly investing in extending their content onto this format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Nic &#8211; having worked with some of Joost and Babelgum&#8217;s competitors I was interested to see how their struggle for content is playing out. I agree that today&#8217;s broadcasters find themselves in a tough position and without content they will continue to struggle. I&#8217;ll be interested to see how the major newspapers play into internet video, and carve out their space. Most now have robust video services and some, like the FT, are clearly investing in extending their content onto this format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: givememedia</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/07/joost-and-babelgum-struggling-for-content/#comment-11237</link>
		<dc:creator>givememedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/04/07/joost-and-babelgum-struggling-for-content/#comment-11237</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Nic - having worked with some of Joost and Babelgum&#039;s competitors I was interested to see how their struggle for content is playing out. I agree that today&#039;s broadcasters find themselves in a tough position and without content they will continue to struggle. I&#039;ll be interested to see how the major newspapers play into internet video, and carve out their space. Most now have robust video services and some, like the FT, are clearly investing in extending their content onto this format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Nic &#8211; having worked with some of Joost and Babelgum&#8217;s competitors I was interested to see how their struggle for content is playing out. I agree that today&#8217;s broadcasters find themselves in a tough position and without content they will continue to struggle. I&#8217;ll be interested to see how the major newspapers play into internet video, and carve out their space. Most now have robust video services and some, like the FT, are clearly investing in extending their content onto this format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.227 seconds -->

