<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labels unrealistic pricing assumptions holding back ad-supported music market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Abo Sabry</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-6508</link>
		<dc:creator>Abo Sabry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 01:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-6508</guid>
		<description>Nice video :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice video <img src='http://www.theequitykicker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abo Sabry</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-5347</link>
		<dc:creator>Abo Sabry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-5347</guid>
		<description>Nice video :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice video <img src='http://www.theequitykicker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music majors being too greedy &#171; The Equity Kicker</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Music majors being too greedy &#171; The Equity Kicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>[...] in February I blogged that unrealistic pricing assumptions from the music majors are holding back the development of free ad-supported music services. At the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in February I blogged that unrealistic pricing assumptions from the music majors are holding back the development of free ad-supported music services. At the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-1512</guid>
		<description>&quot;...but over time we are likely to get the technology which allows us to track the number of times a downloaded song, with ad embedded, is listened to.&quot;

I don&#039;t get that &quot;ad embedded&quot; part. Isn&#039;t that basically adware, then? Someone explain the difference to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;but over time we are likely to get the technology which allows us to track the number of times a downloaded song, with ad embedded, is listened to.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get that &#8220;ad embedded&#8221; part. Isn&#8217;t that basically adware, then? Someone explain the difference to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-11146</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-11146</guid>
		<description>&quot;...but over time we are likely to get the technology which allows us to track the number of times a downloaded song, with ad embedded, is listened to.&quot;

I don&#039;t get that &quot;ad embedded&quot; part. Isn&#039;t that basically adware, then? Someone explain the difference to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;but over time we are likely to get the technology which allows us to track the number of times a downloaded song, with ad embedded, is listened to.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get that &#8220;ad embedded&#8221; part. Isn&#8217;t that basically adware, then? Someone explain the difference to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free ad-supported music coming closer to reality &#171; The Equity Kicker</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>Free ad-supported music coming closer to reality &#171; The Equity Kicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>[...] back we were talking on this blog about how free ad-supported music was on it&#8217;s way but that unrealistic pricing assumptions from the labels were holding the market [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] back we were talking on this blog about how free ad-supported music was on it&#8217;s way but that unrealistic pricing assumptions from the labels were holding the market [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Charakupa</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Charakupa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been interesting following your posts re music industry and tech. 

We are launching something that applies to the industry as well and there has been no shortage (since I started networking in that angle) of companies interested in partnering etc. So far none have been traditional labels. Our model allows me not to worry though.

In general it&#039;s starting to seem like their resistance to change keeps costing them leads in the change sweeping the industry. All other industries experiment with different stuff and do R&amp;D. BP and other oil companies, with green energy etc. 

To paraphrase that old quote; the nice thing to note is that &quot;resistance is futile&quot; in their case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been interesting following your posts re music industry and tech. </p>
<p>We are launching something that applies to the industry as well and there has been no shortage (since I started networking in that angle) of companies interested in partnering etc. So far none have been traditional labels. Our model allows me not to worry though.</p>
<p>In general it&#8217;s starting to seem like their resistance to change keeps costing them leads in the change sweeping the industry. All other industries experiment with different stuff and do R&amp;D. BP and other oil companies, with green energy etc. </p>
<p>To paraphrase that old quote; the nice thing to note is that &#8220;resistance is futile&#8221; in their case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Charakupa</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-11145</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Charakupa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-11145</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been interesting following your posts re music industry and tech. 

We are launching something that applies to the industry as well and there has been no shortage (since I started networking in that angle) of companies interested in partnering etc. So far none have been traditional labels. Our model allows me not to worry though.

In general it&#039;s starting to seem like their resistance to change keeps costing them leads in the change sweeping the industry. All other industries experiment with different stuff and do R&amp;D. BP and other oil companies, with green energy etc. 

To paraphrase that old quote; the nice thing to note is that &quot;resistance is futile&quot; in their case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been interesting following your posts re music industry and tech. </p>
<p>We are launching something that applies to the industry as well and there has been no shortage (since I started networking in that angle) of companies interested in partnering etc. So far none have been traditional labels. Our model allows me not to worry though.</p>
<p>In general it&#8217;s starting to seem like their resistance to change keeps costing them leads in the change sweeping the industry. All other industries experiment with different stuff and do R&amp;D. BP and other oil companies, with green energy etc. </p>
<p>To paraphrase that old quote; the nice thing to note is that &#8220;resistance is futile&#8221; in their case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Reakes</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Reakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>Hi Nic,

My name is Gareth Reakes and I am CTO at We7. I think your analysis is good. I would like to add that the illegal market is only one component of the target market for ad funded services. Technology is changing the way people listen to music and they are trying more and more. If you are someone who pays for your downloads then you are restricted by your budget (who can pay $30 a day a music just to try?). With a model like We7s, you can download 3 new albums onto your iPod in the morning, listen to them on through the day and then buy the couple of tracks in the evening that you really like. The artists of the tracks you decide not to buy are still compensated.

Regarding technologies to track the listens on a download, we have a iTunes plugin in beta that does just that. It also enables us to change the advert when it becomes out of date or less relevant (as well as remove it when its been listened to enough).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nic,</p>
<p>My name is Gareth Reakes and I am CTO at We7. I think your analysis is good. I would like to add that the illegal market is only one component of the target market for ad funded services. Technology is changing the way people listen to music and they are trying more and more. If you are someone who pays for your downloads then you are restricted by your budget (who can pay $30 a day a music just to try?). With a model like We7s, you can download 3 new albums onto your iPod in the morning, listen to them on through the day and then buy the couple of tracks in the evening that you really like. The artists of the tracks you decide not to buy are still compensated.</p>
<p>Regarding technologies to track the listens on a download, we have a iTunes plugin in beta that does just that. It also enables us to change the advert when it becomes out of date or less relevant (as well as remove it when its been listened to enough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Reakes</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-11144</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Reakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2008/02/25/labels-unrealistic-pricing-assumptions-holding-back-ad-supported-music-market/#comment-11144</guid>
		<description>Hi Nic,

My name is Gareth Reakes and I am CTO at We7. I think your analysis is good. I would like to add that the illegal market is only one component of the target market for ad funded services. Technology is changing the way people listen to music and they are trying more and more. If you are someone who pays for your downloads then you are restricted by your budget (who can pay $30 a day a music just to try?). With a model like We7s, you can download 3 new albums onto your iPod in the morning, listen to them on through the day and then buy the couple of tracks in the evening that you really like. The artists of the tracks you decide not to buy are still compensated.

Regarding technologies to track the listens on a download, we have a iTunes plugin in beta that does just that. It also enables us to change the advert when it becomes out of date or less relevant (as well as remove it when its been listened to enough).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nic,</p>
<p>My name is Gareth Reakes and I am CTO at We7. I think your analysis is good. I would like to add that the illegal market is only one component of the target market for ad funded services. Technology is changing the way people listen to music and they are trying more and more. If you are someone who pays for your downloads then you are restricted by your budget (who can pay $30 a day a music just to try?). With a model like We7s, you can download 3 new albums onto your iPod in the morning, listen to them on through the day and then buy the couple of tracks in the evening that you really like. The artists of the tracks you decide not to buy are still compensated.</p>
<p>Regarding technologies to track the listens on a download, we have a iTunes plugin in beta that does just that. It also enables us to change the advert when it becomes out of date or less relevant (as well as remove it when its been listened to enough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.257 seconds -->

