Comments on: Social media to remove the need for linear programming http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/ Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Kite board http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-6632 Kite board Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:23:49 +0000 http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-6632 I am totally impressed with your blog work, just keep posting like this, will definitely be back again. I am totally impressed with your blog work, just keep posting like this, will definitely be back again.

]]> By: surfboards http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-4767 surfboards Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:23:49 +0000 http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-4767 I am totally impressed with your blog work, just keep posting like this, will definitely be back again. I am totally impressed with your blog work, just keep posting like this, will definitely be back again.

]]> By: alan p http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-1024 alan p Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:16:02 +0000 http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-1024 Ah...and there was I thinking Facebook was going to remove the need for Linear Programming, the mathematical technique for finding convergent answers to multivariable linear equations ;) Ah…and there was I thinking Facebook was going to remove the need for Linear Programming, the mathematical technique for finding convergent answers to multivariable linear equations ;)

]]> By: alan p http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-10846 alan p Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:16:00 +0000 http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-10846 Ah...and there was I thinking Facebook was going to remove the need for Linear Programming, the mathematical technique for finding convergent answers to multivariable linear equations ;) Ah…and there was I thinking Facebook was going to remove the need for Linear Programming, the mathematical technique for finding convergent answers to multivariable linear equations ;)

]]> By: Scott http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-1013 Scott Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:41:50 +0000 http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-1013 TV viewers are accustomed to quickly surfing through channels. I suspect one of the first steps in moving people to IPTV is to offer the instantaneous control that people get from their TV. What will it take to get instant-on and the ability to skim multiple channels in a few seconds? I read about Swarmcast yesterday which claims to have some good technology for multi-source streaming. I have no connections with them, but it seems like their claims to reduced buffering time could be useful in the aim to shave seconds off a viewer's experience. TV viewers are accustomed to quickly surfing through channels. I suspect one of the first steps in moving people to IPTV is to offer the instantaneous control that people get from their TV. What will it take to get instant-on and the ability to skim multiple channels in a few seconds?

I read about Swarmcast yesterday which claims to have some good technology for multi-source streaming. I have no connections with them, but it seems like their claims to reduced buffering time could be useful in the aim to shave seconds off a viewer’s experience.

]]> By: Scott http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-10845 Scott Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:41:00 +0000 http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-10845 TV viewers are accustomed to quickly surfing through channels. I suspect one of the first steps in moving people to IPTV is to offer the instantaneous control that people get from their TV. What will it take to get instant-on and the ability to skim multiple channels in a few seconds? I read about Swarmcast yesterday which claims to have some good technology for multi-source streaming. I have no connections with them, but it seems like their claims to reduced buffering time could be useful in the aim to shave seconds off a viewer's experience. TV viewers are accustomed to quickly surfing through channels. I suspect one of the first steps in moving people to IPTV is to offer the instantaneous control that people get from their TV. What will it take to get instant-on and the ability to skim multiple channels in a few seconds?

I read about Swarmcast yesterday which claims to have some good technology for multi-source streaming. I have no connections with them, but it seems like their claims to reduced buffering time could be useful in the aim to shave seconds off a viewer’s experience.

]]> By: Erik http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-1012 Erik Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:41:24 +0000 http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-1012 I think you are underestimating the mass appeal of passive disengagement. I think you are underestimating the mass appeal of passive disengagement.

]]> By: Erik http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-10844 Erik Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:41:00 +0000 http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/07/31/social-media-to-remove-the-need-for-linear-programming/#comment-10844 I think you are underestimating the mass appeal of passive disengagement. I think you are underestimating the mass appeal of passive disengagement.

]]>