<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile internet is ten years behind the wired web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/#comment-989</guid>
		<description>The starting point for all these discussions is that the &quot;mobile internet&quot; would be a mass market mobile phone application, if only the all the technology/pricing issues etc were sorted. Not sure I beleive this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The starting point for all these discussions is that the &#8220;mobile internet&#8221; would be a mass market mobile phone application, if only the all the technology/pricing issues etc were sorted. Not sure I beleive this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/comment-page-1/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/#comment-966</guid>
		<description>This is a good point Alan.  Mobile operators and handset vendors will both fear commoditisation if the systems go open which makes it hard to see a common OS emerging in the short to medium term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good point Alan.  Mobile operators and handset vendors will both fear commoditisation if the systems go open which makes it hard to see a common OS emerging in the short to medium term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan p</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/comment-page-1/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>alan p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/#comment-963</guid>
		<description>More like 1987...there is as yet no common OS. Destroys the economics of mobile apps building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More like 1987&#8230;there is as yet no common OS. Destroys the economics of mobile apps building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/#comment-962</guid>
		<description>That is a great question Farhan.  My first instinct is that we will see some very big companies created but that they will get bought out before they get to the scale of Google.  I say that because the opportunity in mobile is obvious to everyone so it is unlikely that people will make the mistake of allowing a competitor like Google to emerge.

That kind of assumes nothing will come out of left field though, and that is a dangerouse assumption.  There is enough that is new and different about mobile that something truly revolutionary is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a great question Farhan.  My first instinct is that we will see some very big companies created but that they will get bought out before they get to the scale of Google.  I say that because the opportunity in mobile is obvious to everyone so it is unlikely that people will make the mistake of allowing a competitor like Google to emerge.</p>
<p>That kind of assumes nothing will come out of left field though, and that is a dangerouse assumption.  There is enough that is new and different about mobile that something truly revolutionary is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farhan</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Farhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/06/28/mobile-internet-is-ten-years-behind-the-wired-web/#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Do you think we&#039;ll see the emergence of - successful - new firms, on the scale of Google or even a Yahoo with the emergence of mobile internet?  Or do you think established internet or mobile players will win big and get bigger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think we&#8217;ll see the emergence of &#8211; successful &#8211; new firms, on the scale of Google or even a Yahoo with the emergence of mobile internet?  Or do you think established internet or mobile players will win big and get bigger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
