<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Life watch &#8211; outline of future apps visible through the SL fog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/05/09/second-life-watch-outline-of-future-apps-visible-through-the-sl-fog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/05/09/second-life-watch-outline-of-future-apps-visible-through-the-sl-fog/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/05/09/second-life-watch-outline-of-future-apps-visible-through-the-sl-fog/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 14:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/05/09/second-life-watch-outline-of-future-apps-visible-through-the-sl-fog/#comment-862</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Bret.  We learn more out of disagreement than agreement.

I read your post, and I&#039;m afraid we still disagree.  You are right that big business has jumped on SL because of all the mainstream press it is getting, but that doesn&#039;t mean they won&#039;t find a use for it.  I&#039;m not expecting anything to happen quickly, but I&#039;m convinced that SL (or something similar) will emerge as a platform on which other things are built.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Bret.  We learn more out of disagreement than agreement.</p>
<p>I read your post, and I&#8217;m afraid we still disagree.  You are right that big business has jumped on SL because of all the mainstream press it is getting, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they won&#8217;t find a use for it.  I&#8217;m not expecting anything to happen quickly, but I&#8217;m convinced that SL (or something similar) will emerge as a platform on which other things are built.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/05/09/second-life-watch-outline-of-future-apps-visible-through-the-sl-fog/#comment-10730</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/05/09/second-life-watch-outline-of-future-apps-visible-through-the-sl-fog/#comment-10730</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Bret.  We learn more out of disagreement than agreement.

I read your post, and I&#039;m afraid we still disagree.  You are right that big business has jumped on SL because of all the mainstream press it is getting, but that doesn&#039;t mean they won&#039;t find a use for it.  I&#039;m not expecting anything to happen quickly, but I&#039;m convinced that SL (or something similar) will emerge as a platform on which other things are built.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Bret.  We learn more out of disagreement than agreement.</p>
<p>I read your post, and I&#8217;m afraid we still disagree.  You are right that big business has jumped on SL because of all the mainstream press it is getting, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they won&#8217;t find a use for it.  I&#8217;m not expecting anything to happen quickly, but I&#8217;m convinced that SL (or something similar) will emerge as a platform on which other things are built.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/05/09/second-life-watch-outline-of-future-apps-visible-through-the-sl-fog/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 14:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/05/09/second-life-watch-outline-of-future-apps-visible-through-the-sl-fog/#comment-861</guid>
		<description>I thought, at one time, that SL was an incredible platform on which to build new businesses (or extend current businesses in new unique ways). These days I no longer see any real potential. I blogged about how SL really is &quot;just a game&quot; back at brothersinblog a few days back. I think big business has jumped on SL because they have become influenced by mainstream media with claims of SL being the &quot;next big thing.&quot;  They also heard about people making money in SL, and where there is money, there is business -- big and small.  Sorry, but nothing new or lasting will come of SL.  While I do basically disagree with your post, I did enjoy it.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought, at one time, that SL was an incredible platform on which to build new businesses (or extend current businesses in new unique ways). These days I no longer see any real potential. I blogged about how SL really is &#8220;just a game&#8221; back at brothersinblog a few days back. I think big business has jumped on SL because they have become influenced by mainstream media with claims of SL being the &#8220;next big thing.&#8221;  They also heard about people making money in SL, and where there is money, there is business &#8212; big and small.  Sorry, but nothing new or lasting will come of SL.  While I do basically disagree with your post, I did enjoy it.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/05/09/second-life-watch-outline-of-future-apps-visible-through-the-sl-fog/#comment-10729</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/05/09/second-life-watch-outline-of-future-apps-visible-through-the-sl-fog/#comment-10729</guid>
		<description>I thought, at one time, that SL was an incredible platform on which to build new businesses (or extend current businesses in new unique ways). These days I no longer see any real potential. I blogged about how SL really is &quot;just a game&quot; back at brothersinblog a few days back. I think big business has jumped on SL because they have become influenced by mainstream media with claims of SL being the &quot;next big thing.&quot;  They also heard about people making money in SL, and where there is money, there is business -- big and small.  Sorry, but nothing new or lasting will come of SL.  While I do basically disagree with your post, I did enjoy it.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought, at one time, that SL was an incredible platform on which to build new businesses (or extend current businesses in new unique ways). These days I no longer see any real potential. I blogged about how SL really is &#8220;just a game&#8221; back at brothersinblog a few days back. I think big business has jumped on SL because they have become influenced by mainstream media with claims of SL being the &#8220;next big thing.&#8221;  They also heard about people making money in SL, and where there is money, there is business &#8212; big and small.  Sorry, but nothing new or lasting will come of SL.  While I do basically disagree with your post, I did enjoy it.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.227 seconds -->

