<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holiday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/04/01/holiday-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/04/01/holiday-2/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: mspoke</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/04/01/holiday-2/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>mspoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/04/01/holiday-2/#comment-819</guid>
		<description>Nic,

How can you go away when EMI announce they will be offering DRM-free music from May.  Maybe people will respond to this comment.

What I don&#039;t get about the EMI announcement is that people will have to pay a premium (99p for DRM-free as opposed to 79p for DRM tracks) for DRM-free tracks.  Talk about trying to confuse the consumer.  It such a half-a**** effort in my opinion.  What do others think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nic,</p>
<p>How can you go away when EMI announce they will be offering DRM-free music from May.  Maybe people will respond to this comment.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t get about the EMI announcement is that people will have to pay a premium (99p for DRM-free as opposed to 79p for DRM tracks) for DRM-free tracks.  Talk about trying to confuse the consumer.  It such a half-a**** effort in my opinion.  What do others think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mspoke</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/04/01/holiday-2/#comment-10701</link>
		<dc:creator>mspoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/04/01/holiday-2/#comment-10701</guid>
		<description>Nic,

How can you go away when EMI announce they will be offering DRM-free music from May.  Maybe people will respond to this comment.

What I don&#039;t get about the EMI announcement is that people will have to pay a premium (99p for DRM-free as opposed to 79p for DRM tracks) for DRM-free tracks.  Talk about trying to confuse the consumer.  It such a half-a**** effort in my opinion.  What do others think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nic,</p>
<p>How can you go away when EMI announce they will be offering DRM-free music from May.  Maybe people will respond to this comment.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t get about the EMI announcement is that people will have to pay a premium (99p for DRM-free as opposed to 79p for DRM tracks) for DRM-free tracks.  Talk about trying to confuse the consumer.  It such a half-a**** effort in my opinion.  What do others think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.233 seconds -->

