<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pre-roll video ads on The Sun are a turn off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/07/pre-roll-video-ads-on-the-sun-are-a-turn-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/07/pre-roll-video-ads-on-the-sun-are-a-turn-off/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: irfon</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/07/pre-roll-video-ads-on-the-sun-are-a-turn-off/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>irfon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/07/pre-roll-video-ads-on-the-sun-are-a-turn-off/#comment-774</guid>
		<description>nic,
couldnt agree more, &#039;death to pre-roll&#039; it is a lazy way to attempt to monetise content. It is easy for the content owner because it falls back on established cpm revenue models but it rarely enhances the viewing experience.
Why start applying TV style ad models to what should be web 2.0 video experiences?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nic,<br />
couldnt agree more, &#8216;death to pre-roll&#8217; it is a lazy way to attempt to monetise content. It is easy for the content owner because it falls back on established cpm revenue models but it rarely enhances the viewing experience.<br />
Why start applying TV style ad models to what should be web 2.0 video experiences?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irfon</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/07/pre-roll-video-ads-on-the-sun-are-a-turn-off/#comment-10668</link>
		<dc:creator>irfon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/07/pre-roll-video-ads-on-the-sun-are-a-turn-off/#comment-10668</guid>
		<description>nic,
couldnt agree more, &#039;death to pre-roll&#039; it is a lazy way to attempt to monetise content. It is easy for the content owner because it falls back on established cpm revenue models but it rarely enhances the viewing experience.
Why start applying TV style ad models to what should be web 2.0 video experiences?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nic,<br />
couldnt agree more, &#8216;death to pre-roll&#8217; it is a lazy way to attempt to monetise content. It is easy for the content owner because it falls back on established cpm revenue models but it rarely enhances the viewing experience.<br />
Why start applying TV style ad models to what should be web 2.0 video experiences?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.223 seconds -->

