<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brands building their own social nets &#8211; surely that is cart before horse?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/</link>
	<description>Nic Brisbourne's view from London on venture capital and exploiting change in technology and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Eblen</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Eblen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Nike creating a &quot;soccer&quot; social network (it is an American company after all) was an effort that I suspect didn&#039;t play to its strength or core market.  There are Nike fans and there are football fans but do they intersect?  

When I said great brands I may have been too general. I think you literally need to have &#039;brand fans&#039; to make something like this work, but Apple fits that category.  There&#039;s a crowd that lives and breathes all things Apple and I think they could sustain MyAppleSpace.  Definitely a small market though – probably only a few high end fashion and car makers that could do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nike creating a &#8220;soccer&#8221; social network (it is an American company after all) was an effort that I suspect didn&#8217;t play to its strength or core market.  There are Nike fans and there are football fans but do they intersect?  </p>
<p>When I said great brands I may have been too general. I think you literally need to have &#8216;brand fans&#8217; to make something like this work, but Apple fits that category.  There&#8217;s a crowd that lives and breathes all things Apple and I think they could sustain MyAppleSpace.  Definitely a small market though – probably only a few high end fashion and car makers that could do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Eblen</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-10665</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Eblen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-10665</guid>
		<description>Nike creating a &quot;soccer&quot; social network (it is an American company after all) was an effort that I suspect didn&#039;t play to its strength or core market.  There are Nike fans and there are football fans but do they intersect?  

When I said great brands I may have been too general. I think you literally need to have &#039;brand fans&#039; to make something like this work, but Apple fits that category.  There&#039;s a crowd that lives and breathes all things Apple and I think they could sustain MyAppleSpace.  Definitely a small market though – probably only a few high end fashion and car makers that could do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nike creating a &#8220;soccer&#8221; social network (it is an American company after all) was an effort that I suspect didn&#8217;t play to its strength or core market.  There are Nike fans and there are football fans but do they intersect?  </p>
<p>When I said great brands I may have been too general. I think you literally need to have &#8216;brand fans&#8217; to make something like this work, but Apple fits that category.  There&#8217;s a crowd that lives and breathes all things Apple and I think they could sustain MyAppleSpace.  Definitely a small market though – probably only a few high end fashion and car makers that could do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-762</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott - I&#039;m not so sure that even Apple could sustain a social network.  Unless they worked really hard to keep adding content I&#039;m not sure there would be enough there to keep people coming back.  Nike&#039;s failure with Joga, the football focused social net is a good lesson.

I reckon they will give it a go though, so we will probably find out who is right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott &#8211; I&#8217;m not so sure that even Apple could sustain a social network.  Unless they worked really hard to keep adding content I&#8217;m not sure there would be enough there to keep people coming back.  Nike&#8217;s failure with Joga, the football focused social net is a good lesson.</p>
<p>I reckon they will give it a go though, so we will probably find out who is right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-10664</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-10664</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott - I&#039;m not so sure that even Apple could sustain a social network.  Unless they worked really hard to keep adding content I&#039;m not sure there would be enough there to keep people coming back.  Nike&#039;s failure with Joga, the football focused social net is a good lesson.

I reckon they will give it a go though, so we will probably find out who is right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott &#8211; I&#8217;m not so sure that even Apple could sustain a social network.  Unless they worked really hard to keep adding content I&#8217;m not sure there would be enough there to keep people coming back.  Nike&#8217;s failure with Joga, the football focused social net is a good lesson.</p>
<p>I reckon they will give it a go though, so we will probably find out who is right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Eblen</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Eblen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-760</guid>
		<description>I disagree – I think there are some exceptions to your last point.  I’d argue that GREAT brands attract people; it’s all the rest that are the other way around.  What if Apple or 37 Signals created a social network?  They have great brands and could attract quite a crowd.  

However, your incredulity at  the NYT article is justified.  There are too few “great” brands to justify Cisco’s moves in this market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree – I think there are some exceptions to your last point.  I’d argue that GREAT brands attract people; it’s all the rest that are the other way around.  What if Apple or 37 Signals created a social network?  They have great brands and could attract quite a crowd.  </p>
<p>However, your incredulity at  the NYT article is justified.  There are too few “great” brands to justify Cisco’s moves in this market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Eblen</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-10663</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Eblen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-10663</guid>
		<description>I disagree – I think there are some exceptions to your last point.  I’d argue that GREAT brands attract people; it’s all the rest that are the other way around.  What if Apple or 37 Signals created a social network?  They have great brands and could attract quite a crowd.  

However, your incredulity at  the NYT article is justified.  There are too few “great” brands to justify Cisco’s moves in this market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree – I think there are some exceptions to your last point.  I’d argue that GREAT brands attract people; it’s all the rest that are the other way around.  What if Apple or 37 Signals created a social network?  They have great brands and could attract quite a crowd.  </p>
<p>However, your incredulity at  the NYT article is justified.  There are too few “great” brands to justify Cisco’s moves in this market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leafar</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>leafar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-758</guid>
		<description>I agree.
My space made some moves on these paths (with profile like &quot;red&quot;). A very few number of company have the power to create some &quot;metcalfe&quot; but using it is another story.
Best comment on the subject!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.<br />
My space made some moves on these paths (with profile like &#8220;red&#8221;). A very few number of company have the power to create some &#8220;metcalfe&#8221; but using it is another story.<br />
Best comment on the subject!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leafar</title>
		<link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-10662</link>
		<dc:creator>leafar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theequitykicker.com/2007/03/06/brands-building-their-own-social-nets-surely-that-is-cart-before-horse/#comment-10662</guid>
		<description>I agree.
My space made some moves on these paths (with profile like &quot;red&quot;). A very few number of company have the power to create some &quot;metcalfe&quot; but using it is another story.
Best comment on the subject!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.<br />
My space made some moves on these paths (with profile like &#8220;red&#8221;). A very few number of company have the power to create some &#8220;metcalfe&#8221; but using it is another story.<br />
Best comment on the subject!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.245 seconds -->

